the question of god part 2

…”. Hugh Ross: Our comment: The Bible records that, after King David committed adultery with Bathsheba and then had her husband, Uriah, murdered, God sent His prophet, Nathan, to proclaim God’s judgment on David. Objection 1. Plagues of Egypt: Miracles or ‘Mother Nature’? Thank you for your kind words about this article and our work in general. Anyone who claims to speak for God does not have God’s permission to re-interpret His perfect, infallible Word according to the fallible theories of sinful humans. But how all of this led to the development of molecules that could copy themselves and progress with the development of life remains uncertain.”. Our Sin - The Ultimate Question - Part 2 In Touch Ministries with Charles Stanley . You’ll be so glad you did. Jesus’ miracles of healing, for example, of lepers, the blind, and paralytics,10 involved the instant repair of tissues, nerves, muscles, etc., and the instantaneous growth or regrowth of healthy cells. Atheist Christopher Hitchens tells viewers: “The argument of evolution by natural selection has so far survived every challenge that could be made to it by evidence or by analysis. Why? Atheist Christopher Hitchens tells viewers: “98 per cent, perhaps 98.9 per cent of all species ever to appear on earth have gone extinct, which I think would make the designer seem either very clumsy or very malign, or perhaps both.”12 However, his premise is false. Ans. If there is God, then the suggestion of a possible compensation presented above cannot be dismissed merely with a scornful chuckle. Thirdly please pay close attension … : 15 Questions for Evolutionists, Age of the earth: 101 evidences for a young age of the earth and universe, Natural selection cannot explain the origin of life, Origin of life: An explanation of what is needed for abiogenesis, The evolution train’s a-comin’ (Sorry a-goin’—in the wrong direction). So also whatever is done voluntarily must also be traced back to some higher cause other than human reason or will, since … The Whole Church – Free Quarterly Guide! Life and Evolution, Part 1 (Darwinism). I have also included some debates and Questions and Answers videos for you to watch and to hear about the different view points about God and Creation. Natural selection is irrelevant to origin-of-life scenarios because it requires a self-reproducing system. Everything works and is explicable if you believe in it; nothing works if you don’t.” This is a typical elephant-hurling assertion! See: Narrator: “Even if it can be argued that the Creator is the author of the laws of nature, does the evolutionary process itself look like the work of a good and loving God?” Good question (despite the bias with which it is asked). While millions of species are alive today, we know of only 200,000 fossil species in total. This is fully explained in How long were the days of Genesis 1? Music to Your Ears. Atheist Prof. Peter Atkins discusses the idea presented by theistic evolutionists that God has worked through evolution, and says: “If that turns out to be true, then it’s yet one more piece of evidence for God being malign, because the mechanism of evolution is so cruel. ... such as the section on the five ways to demonstrate God’s existence (Part 1, Question 2). His actual words were: “I would give absolutely nothing for theory of nat. Whether God exists? Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. Objection 2. Therefore, for every known fossil species, many more must have existed to connect it to its ancestors and its descendents. I openly admit I am on the road of discovery, so I may get it wrong now and then but that's ok... so we learn. The God Question: Part 2. The Question of God — Program 1 Transcript. It is widely used by a number of Christian denominations for both liturgical and catechetical purposes, most visibly by liturgical Churches of Western tradition, including the Roman Catholic … 2 Corinthians 1:3–7 says God is the comforter and that people learn how to better comfort others when they have personal experience of suffering. Furthermore, ascribing goo-to-you evolution as God’s method of creation not only betrays God, but fails to impress evolutionists. In sound, the laws of acoustics, music, and the speed of sound. This Part begins with the Narrator’s statement: “Ever since the publication of Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species, evolution has been fundamentally important to atheism, sometimes even presented as the intelligent alternative to belief in a Creator. And he says in his book Reflections on the Psalms that one of the great obstacles in coming to believe in the God of the Bible was that when he read the Psalms, the constant demand from God to praise him seemed (to him) to picture God as craving “for our worship like a vain woman who wants compliments.” And so did Michael Prowse. That’s not saying there are no miracles—the miracles are not necessarily Boom! There was also separation from God (Genesis 3:17–19; 22–24). Narrator: “For those who hold firm to evolutionary biology, and also have faith in God, there are some significant challenges to face. The Person the Programme derides as a “fantasy figure in the sky” and a “cosmic magician” is in fact the omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, Almighty God. – Part 2: Question 13 B. Jeremy Lundmark December 21, 2020. Genesis 1:1, Published in 2013 by Search for Truth Enterprises Ltd, a subsidiary of Search for Truth Charitable Trust, a private limited company based in Scotland. John Lennox The very first recorded act of Satan was to cast doubt on the words of God, and then to state that what God had said was false (Genesis 3:1–4). I continued my secular education in high school, the military and college, but as I grew in faith and biblical knowledge, there came a point in time as a young man when theistic evolution no longer made sense. Freud's developing theories on sexual desire cause controversy among his peers. In chapter 4, VanDrunen turns to a survey of the Old Testament in order to understand “the nature and purpose of human culture and believers’ relationship to it.” He writes, “We will see that God creates a deep and fundamental spiritual antithesis between … It also seems to be quite open about the lack of a naturalistic solution to the origin-of-life problem. This question is critical to ponder, for life teaches that everything worth our passion is worth our sacrifice. The very first humans God created, Adam and Eve, were the first Homo sapiens. This is our fourth article evaluating a DVD Series entitled Exploring the God Question,1,2 in which atheists and theistic evolutionists vigorously promote the theory of evolution. By ridiculing the Word of God in the above way, the DVD statement appears to be meant to discourage any young-earther present in a discussion group from voicing what Genesis says. Also, as we pointed out above under What about Miracles?, the essence of a miracle is that it happens immediately, not over a long time. John Piper @JohnPiper. Grigg & Sarfati and by correspondents can be complementary, all facets of a unitary truth: I've found all the responses to "Exploring the God question" very well done, packed full of well formulated answers to most of the questions currently hurled at Bible-believing Creationists. The God Question: Part 2. from Program Two. This excellent new resource contains 12 DVDs (each 30-40 min. One of the greatest challenges faced by Christians today from most non believers is their belief in either evolution (or at least the influence of it) or their creationist view. Related Interviews. What needs to be determined is whether Jesus did, in fact, claim to be God in terms understandable to that particular era and to that particular geographical region, and … Okay. The question of morality, the right and wrong of something, arises only with the belief in the existence of God. ETGQ/0413/1, p. 7, (under the heading “Words, Meaning and the God Question”). They’re actually misusing Scripture. So how do we give an answer to these non believers when they confront us with evolution theory? God has provided overwhelming evidence for the truth of His Word, so much so that He says concerning all those who suppress the truth: Check your email! According to Genesis 2:17 Adam and Eve were told “for the day that you eat of it you shall surely die,” (referring to the fruit of the Tree of Life). What needs to be determined is whether Jesus did, in fact, claim to be God in terms understandable to that particular era and to that particular geographical region, and not necessarily to ours. Adam and Eve could have been created 20,000, 30,000 or 40,000 years ago.”, "For evolution to be true, there would have to have been innumerable transitional forms between different types of creatures. Thankfully, Lucifer season five part two is expected to arrive very soon on Netflix. God's Answer to the Problem of Sin. Great article, really appreciate the comprehensive rebuttal. As explained by Theodosius Dobzhansky: “In order to have natural selection, you have to have self-reproduction … . For more details see our comments in. Also Genesis states that God created the sea creatures “according to their kinds”, and every winged bird “according to its kind”, and the beasts of the earth “according to their kinds”, and the livestock “according to their kinds”, and everything that creeps on the ground “according to its kind”. CMI may choose not to publish your comment depending on how well it fits the guidelines outlined above. Scientists believe that before life began, Earth abounded in the essential raw materials for life: ocean, atmosphere, rocks, and minerals. What is the Nature of the Noahic Covenant? The 3 Rs of evolution: Rearrange, Remove, Ruin—in other words, The origin of life: a problem for evolution, Origin of life: the polymerization problem, multiple miracles by which God delivered the Israelites from slavery in Egypt. Boom! The question is: how that information could have originated.”, Atheist Dr Daniel Dennett (Tufts University, Boston) suggests: “It has to have accumulated by pre-cellular evolution by natural selection; that’s the most obvious process to look at.” Not so! i, 1,3), "the knowledge of God is naturally implanted in all." Since nature works for a determinate end under the direction of a higher agent, whatever is done by nature must needs be traced back to God, as to its first cause. See Strategy of the Devil and Response to the evolution appeasers. Our comment: It would seem that blasphemy is not confined to the atheists in this DVD presentation. It is no small thing to tamper with the Word of God (Deuteronomy 4:2; 12:32), especially to change it so that it conforms to the ideas of atheists, e.g. For a host of articles challenging evolution see challenges to evolution on our website. To our American sensibilities, such a concept seems so right that we hardly … One of the Answers I liked best was to my question about how Ghosts of loved ones could exist on Earth while there was God: "Dead people aren't allowed to hang out as "ghosts". What question will God ask Lucifer? Boom! See Eve created from Adam’s rib and First Adam—last Adam. Kant's comprehensive and systematic works in epistemology, … The question, they should remember, can only be discussed in relation to the role of God as Creator. I'm not asserting this argument to prove a Christian god but mearly that a higher power of some kind exists. Indeed, and the ultimate problem with denying what Genesis says is that, if you can’t believe what God says about Creation in Genesis, why should you believe what He says about our need for salvation in the rest of the Bible, and how to get it, as explained in the New Testament? Age of the earth: 101 evidences for a young age of the earth and the universe, Exploding stars point to a young universe, Christ as the last Adam: Paul’s use of the creation narrative in 1 Corinthians 15, Exploring the God Question 3. By submitting your comment you are agreeing to receive email updates from. : What did God intend us to understand by the words he used? How long were the days of Genesis 1? In this second look at 1 John 5:10-12, Pastor Daniel continues to relay the great importance of a person deciding what they will do with the revelation about Jesus. We have supplied this link to an article on an external website in good faith. This means that a primordial soup is the very last place where amino acids could react to produce more complicated molecules, as the excess water therein would destroy any such molecules more readily than they are formed. Why did God impose the death penalty for sin? It’s giving me an understanding of how to look at origins. The Cosmos, Part 1 (The Big Bang), What the Bible & Science Say About the Age of the Earth, William Lane Craig’s intellectually dishonest attack on biblical creationists, How the West Won: The Neglected Story of the Triumph of Modernity, The Genesis Academy: A 12-part teaching series on Genesis 1–11, The Bible declares: In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. … ” Theist Dr Celia Deane-Drummond (University of Chester) says: “There can never be a full theological explanation of that suffering; there can only ever be a theological response that in order for the natural world to be really free and allow for free will in humans we have to allow for this kind of suffering to take place.” Rev. Furthermore, Genesis does not say that all things were brought fully into existence at creation, but that, in response to God’s command, the earth sprouted plants “according to their own kinds”, and trees “each according to its kind”. He is the central figure of Christianity, the world's largest religion.Most Christians believe he is the incarnation of God the Son and the awaited Messiah (the Christ) prophesied in the Old Testament.. Related quizzes can be found here: The Godfather: Part II . When it comes to origins, the key factor is whether Scripture or ‘science’ is the final authority. Because life has to do with the very special sort of thing called information. The Cosmos, Part 2 (Multiverses) by Russell Grigg. Tweet. Atheists do so, not believing in God; theistic evolutionists do so, not believing what God has said about how He created the universe, the earth, and life, in Genesis 1 and 2. 1 As explained in our response to Part 1 (The big bang), this Series promotes the theory of evolution—not only by atheists who say ‘chance’ did it, but also by theists who add … selection, if it require miraculous additions at any one stage of descent.”3 So we agree that Darwinism has been fundamentally important to atheism. 2.1 First Part of the Second Part. Science & Faith: Enemies or Allies? Elijah, Elisha, Daniel, Jonah (and others). In the process Nathan pronounced this indictment against King David: “You have given great occasion to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme” [show utter contempt (NIV)] (2 Samuel 12:14). Death and Suffering Questions and Answers, Why most scientists believe the world is old, ‘Mainstream science’, theology and Genesis. : What did God intend us to understand by the words he used? And he says: “If you are going to do origins science, you cannot make the presupposition that there is no mind out there, that there is no God.”. Also, if this is an “abuse of Scripture”, it’s an “abuse” shared by most Church Fathers, medieval theologians, and all the Reformers, so modern creationists are in good company. Theist Dr Ken Miller (Biology, Brown University) responds: “ … death is simply a part of life; it is not an act of cruelty. In the American system, all lecturers are called “Professor”. That we are not born with any AMOUNT of faith, but that we either accept God or don't by recieving Him when God calls to us. The Truth About Sin - Part 1. Exploring the God Question 1. Virtually all modern scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed … The information on this site is purely for research sake. by adding evolution to it. But God chose not to use the plural, but the Hebrew singular, yôm, which, with evening and morning = one day. In logic, the law of causality and the law of conservation of mass. In mathematics, the laws of arithmetic, algebra, geometry, trigonometry, probability (discovered by creationist Pascal), and calculus (co-discovered by Newton). Note that atheist Hitchens presumes to know how the God he doesn’t believe in is at fault. Thank you for your thoughtful comments. How Did God Create Man? Aquinas concludes that, although theology does not require philosophy to promote knowledge of God, philosophy nevertheless can be of service to the aims of theology. In mathematics, the laws of arithmetic, algebra, geometry, trigonometry, probability (discovered by creationist Pascal), and calculus (co-discovered by Newton). Part 2 Bethlehem Baptist Church Youth Retreat | Minneapolis Resource by John Piper. DID JESUS CLAIM TO BE GOD- Did He? This is part of the infinite goodness of God, that He should allow evil to exist, and out of it produce good. Why not contact me through the contacts page and put through your suggestion of author and message, and I will gladly research them. See: The Narrator restates the problem: “Every living cell, including the very first on Earth is built using the information in its DNA. But beware of theistic evolution. Privacy Policy, As a Christian teenager attending a secular school, I thought that theistic evolution was probable. For evolution to be true, there would have to have been innumerable transitional forms between different types of creatures. Which leads me to my next clarification. It’s nice that God loves lions, but why not zebras? Monod, J., The Secret of Life, Australian Broadcasting Commission interview with Laurie John, June, 10, 1976. Approaching the question with this kind of an attitude can only lead to erroneous conclusions. December 1. Nevertheless, theistic evolutionist Dr Denis Alexander tells viewers: This denies the explicit Word of God, that Adam was the first human, that through his rebellion against God’s authority sin entered the world and that, in Adam, all have sinned. See: Second, we at CMI, along with innumerable Bible-believing Christians worldwide do not believe in evolution, but everything on Earth and in the universe is still working. Our response: As we have often said,we do not say that the purpose of Genesis was to provide a scientific account, but that all of it was meant to be a true historical account that was also scientifically accurate, because the author, Moses, was inspired by God (2 Timothy 3:16). But as Damascene says (De Fide Orth. And, although I didn’t believe the earth was billions or even millions of years old, I still hung on to the paradigm that it could be several thousands of years old. John Dickson and Simon Smart from the Centre for Public Christianity We know that natural processes can transmit information, but there is no evidence that they can originate it.”. It really all hinges upon ‘no death before the Fall’.”. This is illustrated by the so-called creationist ‘orchard’, as opposed to the evolutionary ‘tree’. Read the following extract carefully and answer the questions that follow. Share This. “and have put on the new self, which is being renewed in knowledge after the image of its creator.” – Col 3:10 ESV. What it contemptuously calls “finger snapping ease” is the power and authority of Almighty God to accomplish His purposes in the precise time He wills His purposes to happen. We suggest the same condemnation applies to the theistic evolutionists in this DVD, i.e. Note that the essence of an act being a miracle is the immediacy of what happened. But the fact that punishment is justly inflicted on us stems in its origins from what is deserved because of our sin. (See Genesis 1:12, 21, 24–25.) See: Christians, there are answers to all the attacks of atheists against the Word of God and against Christianity. The above statements by the theistic evolutionists are a re-interpretation of Genesis to fit in with their long-age view of ‘science’ i.e. Part 2-2, Question 19 124 By contrast, the evil of punishment is, to be sure, from God as its author insofar as it has the nature of something good, viz., because it is just. It seems that the existence of God is self-evident. Much of it is empirically informed, but we really don’t have the evidence that we need to have a very compelling scientific story of how life originated on Earth.” What she really means is that atheists, who in order to maintain their anti-God worldview need to conceive naturalistic explanations for everything the Bible ascribes to the power and authority of Almighty God, haven’t yet managed to think up a plausible alternative to God as the creator of life. See Does Science need evolution? But, if you think about it, that's a contradiction. Death is the result of sin, which brought about God’s curse on the earth, and then Noah’s Flood, which is the reason creatures have gone extinct. The importance of the Resurrection of Christ to our salvation, Walking trees … Modern science helps us understand a puzzling miracle. A FREE downloadable study guide is available from creation.com/tga. Namely the plague of blood, the plague of frogs, the plague of gnats, the plague of flies, the plague on livestock, the plague of boils, the plague of hail, the plague of locusts, the plague of darkness, and the plague of the death of the firstborn. In the DVD, Prof. Andy McIntosh (Thermodynamics, University of Leeds) sums up the biblical creationist view by describing the DNA code as a language and then he quotes the opening verse of the Gospel of John: “ In the beginning was the Word (or the Logos or the Message)”. The Question of God and Creation – Part 2 Posted by understandyourfaith on April 22, 2016 June 16, 2016 One of the greatest challenges faced by Christians today from most non believers is their belief in either evolution (or at least the influence of it) or their creationist view. If so, shame! Miss Mason took off her glasses, blew on them and wiped them on her soft white handkerchief. The question then closes with a refutation of the arguments presented in the videtur section. The Hundred Dresses Part 2 Extra Questions and Answers Reference-to-Context. See: Narrator: “Nevertheless, for those who interpret Genesis metaphorically, there remains the puzzling question, where in the evolutionary process Homo sapiens emerged as spiritual beings?”. DID JESUS CLAIM TO BE GOD- Did He? In the DVD, Dr Carol Cleland opines: “All of physics along with biology goes down if you are going to really challenge the scientific evidence for the antiquity of the universe and the earth and evolution.” This is meaningless evolution-speak. This article is part of the Questions and Answers series. As to whether Darwinism is science, we also pointed out that Darwin made thousands of changes in the six editions of his Origin, with many, many hundreds of equivocations. Sign Up. Read ?QUESTION? See. Providing your postcode enables us to let you know when a speaking event is in your area. Exploring the God Question 2. The Second Part deals with man in greater depth, and the Third Part discusses Jesus Christ, who serves as mediator between God and man in Christian thought. And that is true of the pursuit of God. Life and Evolution, Part 2 (Origin of Life) by Russell Grigg Published: 29 January 2015 (GMT+10) This is our fourth article evaluating a DVD Series entitled Exploring the God Question, 1,2 in which atheists and theistic evolutionists vigorously promote the theory of evolution. … But some scientists reject the stark choice. ©2021 Creation Ministries International. CMI has offices in Australia, Canada, Singapore, New Zealand, United Kingdom, South Africa and United States of America. December 2. And have put on the new man, Concerning which, and the putting it on; see Gill on Eph 4:24, Below I have complied a list of videos from different Scientists and pastors who I hope will shed some light on answering some of the questions you may yourself, or may be asked from non believers. Those are just incompatible.” So far totally correct! In chemistry, the notion of chemical elements (discovered by creationist Boyle) and the principles of the Periodic table. But we cannot assume responsibility for, nor be taken as endorsing in any way, any other content or links on any such site. EXTRA QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS OF -A LETTER TO GOD PART-1 . 21. mimir, kratos, harem. It is in this sense that Wisdom 1:13 and 1:16 says, So... why do some people believe it's … It is so frustrating that misinformation and fantasy are paraded as science. However, natural selection operates to remove genetic information, not to create it. Video 6:51. I am so thankful to be part of a church that understands God’s love has not been lifted when we walk through suffering. How evolution has harmed science and society, Professor of evolution calls Darwinism ‘pseudo science’, G.K. Chesterton: Darwinism is ‘An attack on thought itself’, Question evolution! On Day 2, the atmosphere; on Day 3 the dry land appeared and God caused it to sprout plants and trees; on Day 4, the sun, moon, and stars; on Day 5, all the sea creatures and flying creatures; on Day 6, land animals and the first man and woman. Creation Ministries International (CMI) exists to support the effective proclamation of the Gospel by providing credible answers that affirm the reliability of the Bible, in particular its Genesis history. The way in which life came about can’t be explained in that fashion.”, Theistic evolutionist Rev. Hence the truth of the Word of God in Genesis, that it was the Living God who gave life to all the first specimens of all the different kinds of life on earth, and in the way that God said He did (Genesis 1:20–27). Close. As biblical creationist Andy McIntosh tells viewers: “1 Corinthians 15 clearly teaches that death came in through Adam’s sin. The Truth About Sin - Part 2. Question about Ghosts+God Part 2? There are demons that can pretend to be dead people, in order to deceive people. " This is part 2 of Keith Mathison's review of Living in Two Kingdoms by David VanDrunen. John Dickson and Simon Smart from the Centre for Public Christianity The seven signs recorded in John’s Gospel are: E.g., lepers: Luke 5:12–13 and Luke 17:11–19; the blind: Matthew 9:37–30 and John 9:1–7; paralytics: Luke 5:17–26 and Luke 6:6–10. Under the list of laws that “do not ‘go-down’”, the discovery of algebra is attributed to Pascal. In our previous article in this series, on Darwinism, we pointed out that Darwin said he would reject his own theory if it involved God. The net result was the creation of healthy functioning parts of the body to replace diseased, non-functioning or atrophied parts. This is part of the infinite goodness of God, that He should allow evil to exist, and out of it produce good. The Godfather: Part II Trivia Questions & Answers : Godfather, The This category is for questions and answers and fun facts related to The Godfather: Part II ., as asked by users of FunTrivia.com. Why would a loving God allow death and suffering? Genesis Debate. Your subscription already exists. And it says, without a shadow of a doubt, that God literally took the ground and out of it made Adam; that He literally took out of Adam and made Eve.” [Genesis 2:7; 21–24.] See: The theistic evolutionists in this DVD who reject Genesis as being a true historical account are apparently unaware that, if God had wanted to tell us that He used evolution or that it was an ancient creation, then there are several Hebrew words and constructions He could have used to say both of these things.The simplest (and easiest for the original readers to understand) would have been to use the Hebrew word for ‘day’ in the plural, yamin. Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube. What is the Nature of the Noahic Covenant? This biblical teaching is promptly denied by theistic evolutionist Dr Francis Collins, who says: “You can’t put that together with what science is teaching us about the universe. He states, “Your entire life—present and future—is shaped by how you respond to the testimony of God concerning Jesus Christ.” With a look at … In electromagnetism, Maxwell’s Equations, and Faraday’s Law of Induction (Maxwell and Faraday were creationists). Any clarification would be greatly appreciated; and keep up the solid work. (!) The New Testament tells of the many miracles associated with the virginal conception, life, death and Resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ. Has Science buried God? Answer: The Bible describes a huge number of miracles (concentrated in key parts of biblical history)—from the supernatural acts of God during Creation Week described in Genesis 1:1–2:3,7 through the multiple miracles by which God delivered the Israelites from slavery in Egypt (Exodus chapters 7–12),8 to other miracles recorded in the Old Testament involving various prophets of God, e.g. Part 2 from the story God of Titan by L0neCouri3r (The Lone Courier) with 501 reads. Devotions Faith Featured. They argue that Darwin is not a threat to belief and make the case for God and evolution.”. How does the story reflect the quality of simplicity? This is no problem for Bible-believing creationists. Thus when the penalty of death came into force because of Adam’s sin, death and suffering came upon the animal kingdom, and upon us, as well. If the healings had gradually happened over several weeks, months, years, or ages, they would not have been regarded as miraculous.11. The First Part addresses God, gradually working its way through God’s creation and the angels to man. Reply to Objection 2.